Author: Peter Stayne
Date: 18:03:10 05/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
Actually no, I questioned your content as well. Read again. On May 18, 2003 at 20:43:59, Alex wrote: >HAH! You just prove my point! You attack the FORM of the post far more so than >the concept (that of the King being a top if not THE top engine) of the post! >NEEENER NEEEENER! Duh! Chess base appearas biased because as Ipointed out in >the first post that they tested cm 6000 and it topped the list and then they >QUIT testing it!!! It makes not only I who doubts the veracity of the SSDF!! >My sentiment has been voiced before by others! Money IS a motivating factor to >skew results. I can not OBVIOUSLY 100% assert that the SSDF is biased -- >but............
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.