Author: Alex
Date: 18:16:05 05/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2003 at 21:03:10, Peter Stayne wrote: >Actually no, I questioned your content as well. Read again. > >On May 18, 2003 at 20:43:59, Alex wrote: > >>HAH! You just prove my point! You attack the FORM of the post far more so than >>the concept (that of the King being a top if not THE top engine) of the post! >>NEEENER NEEEENER! Duh! Chess base appearas biased because as Ipointed out in >>the first post that they tested cm 6000 and it topped the list and then they >>QUIT testing it!!! It makes not only I who doubts the veracity of the SSDF!! >>My sentiment has been voiced before by others! Money IS a motivating factor to >>skew results. I can not OBVIOUSLY 100% assert that the SSDF is biased -- >>but............ Indeed.......I must assert however that the primary thrust of your post was to assault the form of the post which really is NOT important. Anyways........I bet that you must really hate to see Chessmaster kick some righteous stuff eh? Hee Hee. Otherwise you would not have been sooooooooo....... meticulous in regard to your thesis which I reiterate really misses the point. As one who has been in the Psychology business for 25 + years I could just SMELL the pain and the frustration in your text. LOL!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.