Author: Alex
Date: 20:46:50 05/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2003 at 21:40:28, Peter Stayne wrote: >Actually, no, I'm a writer by trade, thus it pains me to see someone with >something that's possibly a legitimate point killing it with bad form. > >I've owned every Chessmaster since 2100 and am as big a fan of it as I am the >Chessbase series for different reasons. If, indeed, something is going on here, >I'd certainly want to know. > >You sound juvenile in your post, like a kid who just unwrapped a new Gameboy on >Christmas morning. You don't sound like an adult who is trying to propose >serious accusations to a forum of other adults. > >One of the first rules of writing is 'know your audience'. > >On May 18, 2003 at 21:16:05, Alex wrote: > >>On May 18, 2003 at 21:03:10, Peter Stayne wrote: >> >>>Actually no, I questioned your content as well. Read again. >>> >>>On May 18, 2003 at 20:43:59, Alex wrote: >>> >>>>HAH! You just prove my point! You attack the FORM of the post far more so than >>>>the concept (that of the King being a top if not THE top engine) of the post! >>>>NEEENER NEEEENER! Duh! Chess base appearas biased because as Ipointed out in >>>>the first post that they tested cm 6000 and it topped the list and then they >>>>QUIT testing it!!! It makes not only I who doubts the veracity of the SSDF!! >>>>My sentiment has been voiced before by others! Money IS a motivating factor to >>>>skew results. I can not OBVIOUSLY 100% assert that the SSDF is biased -- >>>>but............ >>Indeed.......I must assert however that the primary thrust of your post was to >>assault the form of the post which really is NOT important. Anyways........I >>bet that you must really hate to see Chessmaster kick some righteous stuff eh? >>Hee Hee. Otherwise you would not have been sooooooooo....... meticulous in >>regard to your thesis which I reiterate really misses the point. As one who has >>been in the Psychology business for 25 + years I could just SMELL the pain and >>the frustration in your text. LOL! YOU a writer? Indeed.......... Then why do you verbally assault one for being exuberant? Obviously you aren't a poet! WHAT? You CORRECT my prose? Shades of High School! The English police are here! Sheeeesh! Lighten up! You will live longer!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.