Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 08:34:40 05/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 2003 at 10:27:34, Jason Waugh wrote: >On May 19, 2003 at 10:16:43, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>2) ChessBase is the only trademark I know of that is present in the spin doctor >>business everywhere when it goes about chess or computerchess. Lokasoft might be >>a good company but I simply never saw them sponsoring main events. Excuse me if > > >You haven't heard of that software that comes with The King.... umm, what's it >called again...... > >oh yeah... Chessmaster? > >Talk to a chess enthusiast and there is a chance he or she knows about >Chessbase... talk to any average joe and there's a greater chance they've heard >of Chessmaster. > >Actually, there are probably more people who will remember having played Battle >Chess on a Commodore=64 than people who have heard of Chessbase. Objection! Everybody who plays chess and who loves to collect his own games, uses ChessBase tools. Simply because they present the state of the art of the actual chess documentation. Don't tell me that someone is happy with PGN. Then he's a bad player because he never thinks about variations in chess. But chess without variations is not chess. Ed Schröder's REBEL suffered from that illness already. A program without the ability to analyse variations is mute. > > >Jason W.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.