Author: José Carlos
Date: 08:56:48 05/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 2003 at 11:34:40, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On May 19, 2003 at 10:27:34, Jason Waugh wrote: > >>On May 19, 2003 at 10:16:43, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>2) ChessBase is the only trademark I know of that is present in the spin doctor >>>business everywhere when it goes about chess or computerchess. Lokasoft might be >>>a good company but I simply never saw them sponsoring main events. Excuse me if >> >> >>You haven't heard of that software that comes with The King.... umm, what's it >>called again...... >> >>oh yeah... Chessmaster? >> >>Talk to a chess enthusiast and there is a chance he or she knows about >>Chessbase... talk to any average joe and there's a greater chance they've heard >>of Chessmaster. >> >>Actually, there are probably more people who will remember having played Battle >>Chess on a Commodore=64 than people who have heard of Chessbase. > >Objection! > >Everybody ^^^^^^^^^ That's false. I'm sure. José C. > who plays chess and who loves to collect his own games, uses ChessBase >tools. Simply because they present the state of the art of the actual chess >documentation. Don't tell me that someone is happy with PGN. Then he's a bad >player because he never thinks about variations in chess. But chess without >variations is not chess. Ed Schröder's REBEL suffered from that illness already. >A program without the ability to analyse variations is mute. > > > > > >> >> >>Jason W.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.