Author: Milorad Madjar
Date: 10:16:52 05/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
I received this answer on CSS-forum: Hello Milan I try to translate the whole into the English once, with a translator program, I hope that you can understand that! Hello Milan, hello chess-friends! I have also tried once, these two moves, that The King has played in Leiden, to analyze, since Milan could not reconstruct! However I have stand the parameter (opq=100), I understood it so that only, myq=101, should be put, all other remains on default in the CM-Settings! Since I has think an AMD-MP2200+ calculator I that it from the performance, rather identical is, with the calculator in Leiden, that has been also an AMD-XP2200+, on which King played! So now to my realizations! I could reconstruct the two moves, that first-once!!!!! BUT! It is necessary to experiment with the attitude of the Hashtables that putting in in the WB2Uci.eng is! Belongings so quite everything through tries! , (32MB-64MB-48MB-40MB-36MB-128MB-16MB, with all these Hash attitudes, both moves are not analyzed in an attitude, either it is played only 37 ...h5, or 23 ...Rac8! But both in a Hash attitude not!!! My last attempt before I wanted to give up, I have planned attitude (24MB) with the Hash. In this Hash attitude, The King plays both moves! After 2Min.19sec, he/it plays 23 ...Rac8 in depth 12, and also in depth 13 after 4Min.30sec retains the move he/it! After 1Min.10sec, he/it plays the move 37 ...h5 in depth 12! However, he/it discards him/it in depth according to 13 in favor of 3Min.34sec again from, 37 ...f6s! Until then however he/it retains 37 ...h5s so that I assume that no one have been calculated 3Min.34sec at this move in ailments! Hope that my realization helps something with the attitude of the Leidensettings! MFG Volker Göbel http://f23.parsimony.net/forum50826/messages/66710.htm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.