Author: Mike S.
Date: 16:26:41 05/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
Both tournaments contain surprising results, considering that these were 10 full
round robins each...
From tournament 1:
Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - Draws
1 Fritz 8 : 29.5/ 50 59.0 2539 2603 90 82 30.0 %
<!>2 Chess Tiger 14 : 26.0/ 50 52.0 2548 2562 99 63 44.0 %
3 Deep Fritz 7 : 26.0/ 50 52.0 2548 2562 99 63 44.0 %
4 Shredder 7 : 24.5/ 50 49.0 2551 2544 71 101 34.0 %
5 Tiger 15 normal : 24.0/ 50 48.0 2552 2538 67 99 40.0 %
<?>6 Shredder 7.04 : 20.0/ 50 40.0 2562 2491 67 89 44.0 %
Tournament 2:
> Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - Draws
> 1 Shredder Paderborn : 34.0/ 50 68.0 2528 2659 80 95 28.0 %
> 2 Ruffian 1.0.1 : 28.0/ 50 56.0 2543 2584 94 69 40.0 %
<?>3 Fritz 8 : 25.0/ 50 50.0 2550 2550 78 78 40.0 %
> 4 List 504 : 24.0/ 50 48.0 2552 2538 63 99 44.0 %
> 5 Deep Sjeng 1.0 : 19.5/ 50 39.0 2562 2485 79 88 34.0 %
> 6 Deep Junior 7 : 19.5/ 50 39.0 2562 2485 93 88 22.0 %
I'm not too surprised that DJ7 ranks last, because I saw it already on several
rating lists that it is often behind Ruffian and/or List, on single CPU (I
believe that Junior may be significantly stronger in SMP comparisons). The only
one to win *all* it's mini matches in these tourneys was Shredder Paderborn.
Do you have comments for the "unusual" rankings (yet), or is this just within
the normal bandwidth of what can be expected, even in such large tournaments?
Please give us a hint when you have updated your rating list with these games.
Thanks,
Mike Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.