Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 00:13:21 05/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 2003 at 17:22:27, enrico carrisco wrote: >On May 19, 2003 at 10:25:11, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On May 19, 2003 at 05:28:00, enrico carrisco wrote: >> >>>On May 18, 2003 at 17:51:09, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>> >>>>On May 18, 2003 at 16:26:33, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 18, 2003 at 15:03:11, Roger Brown wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On May 18, 2003 at 11:51:17, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>If FRITZ is not winning at Leiden then SHREDDER wins or DEEP SJENG, the newest >>>>>>>engine of ChessBase. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Hello Rolf, >>>>>> >>>>>>This is incorrect. Deep Sjeng is the product of Gian-carlo Pascutto. It is a >>>>>>WB/UCI compliant engine released by Lokasoft, one of the companies which >>>>>>released Chess Tiger 15. >>>>> >>>>>IMO ChessBase makes PR for the engine of Deep Sjeng. Should I get you the link? >>>>QUOTE: >>>> >>>>UCI-Engines >>>>Sjeng 12.13 >>>>32Bit Schachengine von Gian-Carlo Pascutto (mit Zugriff auf den Nalimov Endspiel >>>>Turbo). Mehr Informationen zu Sjeng finden Sie auf Gian-Carlo Pascuttos >>>>Webseite. >>>>Hier finden Sie eine Beschreibung der Versionen von Sjeng. >>>>Mehr über Sjeng und Gian-Carlo Pascutto... >>>>Der Download enthält eine Installation für die Engine. Installieren Sie die >>>>Engine in Ihrem ChessBase- Verzeichnis, z.B. in C:\Programme\ChessBase. >>>>Diese Engine benötigt Fritz 7 in der Update-Version vom 21.01.2002 oder Shredder >>>>Classic. >>>>Download Sjeng 12.13 >>>> >>>> >>>>Ok? Link in ChessBase, Downloads. >>>> >>>> >>>>Rolf Tueschen >>>> >>> >>>Crafty is also available in the download section for FREE ENGINES on the >>>Chessbase website. You are really digging here. >> >>Science is connected to research, yes. The point is the defining of standards. >>So, the monopolism in CC is not just one of economy, it is also one of the basic >>vocabulary. Something went wrong in the past. And it's true, I have a problem >>with Bob's Crafty in ChessBase. But there are no alternatives. Why? >>Give your own contribution and dig a little bit. >> >> > >Dig for what? This is your crusade, not mine. You're using a FREE engine >download page on the Chessbase website and determining that if an engine appears >there or has been ported -- it is a Chessbase product. Typical nonsense of >yours -- my only reason to reply is to correct those not extensively familiar >with the companies that market the engines *OR* your exhausting B.S. > >As far as "my own contribution"... Rather than wasting time here attempting to >_appear_ knowledgeable or cause conflict for my own personal pleasure, I prefer >to help in the development of computer chess software. I see. You make money instead of reasearching for science purposes. And that puts you into the position to insult other people. I see. At least that is your imagination. I read the ChessBase contribution for Sjeng. Just wait until I get access to my ER. And then you come back and talk about nonsense and B.S. which should read bullshit if I understand your fecal vocabulary right. > >-elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.