Author: Tim Foden
Date: 07:25:22 05/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2003 at 09:39:42, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 20, 2003 at 02:45:47, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >> >>Great progress by Movei, since I tested it last year. Congratulations Uri. >>Please do NOT make an argument about being only ten games, this was only to get >>an Idea of the progress of Uri program which I have not tested since last March >>of 2002 against Chess Tiger 14.9 for Palm. >> >>PS: For those that constantly complaint about not testing enough, they should >>concentrate their argument about those ICT3 short tournaments of only 9 games. > >I think that these games gave me some ideas to improve movei by adding rules >when not to use my pruning rules but I will need to test it. > >Movei main problem seems to be in the endgame. I managed to watch some of the GLC-Movei games as they were played on FICS. One of the things I noted was that in the early and middle game, movei was generally searching a bit deeper than GLC. Towards the endgame GLC caught up, and as the position got more and more simple, GLC searched relatively deeper and deeper, ending about 4 to 6 ply ahead. I guess this is due to GLC using the hash table information for cutoffs whereas Movei doesn't do this. Cheers, Tim.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.