Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 14:25:54 05/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2003 at 17:14:08, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >On May 20, 2003 at 16:50:54, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >> From what I have just read in this forum >> >> http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?297309 >> http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?297327 >> >> it does not make sense to test The King 3.23 with different settings. >> Therefore, I have decided >> >> - to stop all my work with this engine >> - to close the Chessmaster section on our homepage >> - to never again write something about CM9 and our experience with >> this great engine. >> >> A somewhat disappointed Chessmaster fan ... >> >> Kind regards >> Kurt > >I understand you very well. It is dissapointing to see how less human beeings >are able to learn from each other.I can´t understand the words of Mr Merlino.Why >it is not possible to know more about TheKIng as Johan Koning itself? You only >have to see more games of TheKing as Johan de Koning and to look deeper in this >games.That´s all,chess is chess and statistics are statistics. I think that Thomas is right. In a chess program, there is almost an unlimited number of parameters to be tuned. You can never exclude that a busy tester can find a reasonable alternative or even an improvement to the author's favorite settings. I can however understand that it may be difficult to convince the author. May be that Johan is a bit conservative und doesn't want to spoil things. Kurt, if I were you and I were convinced that my settings are superior, then I would go on and try to prove it. Perform tournaments with lots of games where CM standard and CM-KU are competing. Uli > >Greetings > >TL
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.