Author: alan palmer
Date: 04:23:21 05/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2003 at 23:46:50, Alex wrote: >On May 18, 2003 at 21:40:28, Peter Stayne wrote: > >>Actually, no, I'm a writer by trade, thus it pains me to see someone with >>something that's possibly a legitimate point killing it with bad form. >> >>I've owned every Chessmaster since 2100 and am as big a fan of it as I am the >>Chessbase series for different reasons. If, indeed, something is going on here, >>I'd certainly want to know. >> >>You sound juvenile in your post, like a kid who just unwrapped a new Gameboy on >>Christmas morning. You don't sound like an adult who is trying to propose >>serious accusations to a forum of other adults. >> >>One of the first rules of writing is 'know your audience'. >> >>On May 18, 2003 at 21:16:05, Alex wrote: >> >>>On May 18, 2003 at 21:03:10, Peter Stayne wrote: >>> >>>>Actually no, I questioned your content as well. Read again. >>>> >>>>On May 18, 2003 at 20:43:59, Alex wrote: >>>> >>>>>HAH! You just prove my point! You attack the FORM of the post far more so than >>>>>the concept (that of the King being a top if not THE top engine) of the post! >>>>>NEEENER NEEEENER! Duh! Chess base appearas biased because as Ipointed out in >>>>>the first post that they tested cm 6000 and it topped the list and then they >>>>>QUIT testing it!!! It makes not only I who doubts the veracity of the SSDF!! >>>>>My sentiment has been voiced before by others! Money IS a motivating factor to >>>>>skew results. I can not OBVIOUSLY 100% assert that the SSDF is biased -- >>>>>but............ >>>Indeed.......I must assert however that the primary thrust of your post was to >>>assault the form of the post which really is NOT important. Anyways........I >>>bet that you must really hate to see Chessmaster kick some righteous stuff eh? >>>Hee Hee. Otherwise you would not have been sooooooooo....... meticulous in >>>regard to your thesis which I reiterate really misses the point. As one who has >>>been in the Psychology business for 25 + years I could just SMELL the pain and >>>the frustration in your text. LOL! > YOU a writer? Indeed.......... Then why do you verbally assault one for being >exuberant? Obviously you aren't a poet! WHAT? You CORRECT my prose? Shades >of High School! The English police are here! Sheeeesh! Lighten up! You will >live longer! You sound unbalanced - have you just escaped from an Institution? It would take more than one tournament win to prove your point but you do not appear to be interested in unbiased testing. Accusing everybody of some sort of wrongdoing on the basis of one result, DOH!!!!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.