Author: Johan de Koning
Date: 04:11:10 05/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 23, 2003 at 03:08:43, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 22, 2003 at 21:13:23, Johan de Koning wrote: > >>On May 22, 2003 at 12:12:09, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On May 22, 2003 at 11:48:11, alan palmer wrote: >>> >>>>On May 21, 2003 at 23:35:07, Johan de Koning wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 20, 2003 at 16:50:54, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> From what I have just read in this forum >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?297309 >>>>>> http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?297327 >>>>>> >>>>>> it does not make sense to test The King 3.23 with different settings. >>>>>> Therefore, I have decided >>>>>> >>>>>> - to stop all my work with this engine >>>>>> - to close the Chessmaster section on our homepage >>>>>> - to never again write something about CM9 and our experience with >>>>>> this great engine. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>From what I've seen at the Leiden tournament >>>>> >>>>>Sjeng - Fritz 1-0 >>>>>Fritz - Tao 1/2 >>>>> >>>>>it seems that Shredder is a very weak program. >>>>>Therefore I have decided to >>>>> >>>>>- quit playing against it >>>>>- remove all games from my database >>>>>- never again talk to Stefan or his computer. >>>> >>>>You miss the point - how about a match between your default settings for the >>>>"King" and Kurt's setttings? Ridiculous thought maybe but i have a feeling i >>>>know who would run scared. >>> >>>You are the one who missed the point. >> >>It seems my point was well hidden. >>Maybe not enough smileys? >>Well, I wasn't in the mood for smileys. >> >>Doesn't it seem strange to suddenly change ones opinion of Shredder based on >>only two games played by Fritz? >> >>Some smileys now, just to be safe. :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) > >I did not respond to your post but to the post that came after it. >I guess that the poster who responded to your post also did not respond to >your post but to anohter thing that people assumed that you said that there are >not enough games to prove that kurt's personality is better. LOL I'm not sure if this is a response to your post which was not a response to mine, or to your response to the post that was a response to mine but probably wasn't. I am sure though it's getting pointless. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.