Author: alan palmer
Date: 08:06:55 05/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 23, 2003 at 07:11:10, Johan de Koning wrote: >On May 23, 2003 at 03:08:43, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 22, 2003 at 21:13:23, Johan de Koning wrote: >> >>>On May 22, 2003 at 12:12:09, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On May 22, 2003 at 11:48:11, alan palmer wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 21, 2003 at 23:35:07, Johan de Koning wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On May 20, 2003 at 16:50:54, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> From what I have just read in this forum >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?297309 >>>>>>> http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?297327 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> it does not make sense to test The King 3.23 with different settings. >>>>>>> Therefore, I have decided >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - to stop all my work with this engine >>>>>>> - to close the Chessmaster section on our homepage >>>>>>> - to never again write something about CM9 and our experience with >>>>>>> this great engine. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>From what I've seen at the Leiden tournament >>>>>> >>>>>>Sjeng - Fritz 1-0 >>>>>>Fritz - Tao 1/2 >>>>>> >>>>>>it seems that Shredder is a very weak program. >>>>>>Therefore I have decided to >>>>>> >>>>>>- quit playing against it >>>>>>- remove all games from my database >>>>>>- never again talk to Stefan or his computer. >>>>> >>>>>You miss the point - how about a match between your default settings for the >>>>>"King" and Kurt's setttings? Ridiculous thought maybe but i have a feeling i >>>>>know who would run scared. >>>> >>>>You are the one who missed the point. >>> >>>It seems my point was well hidden. >>>Maybe not enough smileys? >>>Well, I wasn't in the mood for smileys. >>> >>>Doesn't it seem strange to suddenly change ones opinion of Shredder based on >>>only two games played by Fritz? >>> >>>Some smileys now, just to be safe. :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) >> >>I did not respond to your post but to the post that came after it. >>I guess that the poster who responded to your post also did not respond to >>your post but to anohter thing that people assumed that you said that there are >>not enough games to prove that kurt's personality is better. > >LOL >I'm not sure if this is a response to your post which was not a response to >mine, or to your response to the post that was a response to mine but probably >wasn't. I am sure though it's getting pointless. :-) LOL I'm completely lost!! What does all the above mean? What is the meaning of life? I'm going to join a monastery and become a monk. I think this subject should now be cracefully retired. And yes, you still have a lovely smile!!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.