Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: postal chess and computer use(tactical and not tatcial nt)

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 09:17:37 05/24/03

Go up one level in this thread


On May 24, 2003 at 12:16:36, Uri Blass wrote:

>On May 24, 2003 at 12:01:43, James Constance wrote:
>
>>Personally, I don't mind if my opponent uses a computer in correspondence chess.
>> I think they can help avoid immediate tactical disaster but are pretty crap at
>>making long term plans.  Taking their inclusion for granted, when I play I tend
>>towards a positional game, which I find rewarding.  I think it would be dull to
>>have a computer suggest all your moves, as you would not be taking part in the
>>creative process: but if my opponent wants to, that's fine by me! :)
>
>I think that you underestimate computers.
>They can also be good in making moves that make the illusion of plan.
>
>Computers could not score so well against GM's only by avoiding immediate
>tatcial disaster.
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.