Author: Matthew White
Date: 16:43:29 05/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2003 at 18:46:53, Pierre Chevalier wrote: >On May 24, 2003 at 18:12:48, Matthew White wrote: > > >>>>It's time to see chess engines 2 years later can understand these testpostitions >>>>especially the 10 hardest ones. >>>>By looking at 170,212 post you will see the results of 2 years ago. > >>It took me a while to find it... >>http://fortuna.iasi.rdsnet.ro/ccc/ccc.php?art_id=168519 >These positions are all openings situations--hardly the area of expertise >for a computer. Would you criticise a computer that could not solve >these perfectly? This material should all be book material. From what I could see, most of these are opening "trap"-type situations. Yes, they occur in the opening, but many of these have relatively shallow reasons for the positional decision. The only one that has not been solved by a computer (according to the test, and my own experimentation) in 2 minutes is #22, which is in Shredder's book (and I would assume others too). Matt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.