Author: Jonathan Lee
Date: 16:56:16 05/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2003 at 19:43:29, Matthew White wrote: >On May 24, 2003 at 18:46:53, Pierre Chevalier wrote: > >>On May 24, 2003 at 18:12:48, Matthew White wrote: >> >> >>>>>It's time to see chess engines 2 years later can understand these testpostitions >>>>>especially the 10 hardest ones. >>>>>By looking at 170,212 post you will see the results of 2 years ago. >> >>>It took me a while to find it... >>>http://fortuna.iasi.rdsnet.ro/ccc/ccc.php?art_id=168519 >>These positions are all openings situations--hardly the area of expertise >>for a computer. Would you criticise a computer that could not solve >>these perfectly? This material should all be book material. >From what I could see, most of these are opening "trap"-type situations. Yes, >they occur in the opening, but many of these have relatively shallow reasons for >the positional decision. The only one that has not been solved by a computer >(according to the test, and my own experimentation) in 2 minutes is #22, which >is in Shredder's book (and I would assume others too). > >Matt http://fortuna.iasi.rdsnet.ro/ccc/ccc.php?art_id=170212 Jonathan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.