Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:51:53 05/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 2003 at 00:55:38, Albert Silver wrote: >On May 24, 2003 at 11:57:08, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 24, 2003 at 10:01:22, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>On May 24, 2003 at 04:34:04, Tony Hedlund wrote: >>> >>>>[Event "SSDF"] >>>>[Site "Tony Hedlund"] >>>>[Date "2003.05.24"] >>>>[Round "3"] >>>>[White "Fritz 8 A1200"] >>>>[Black "Shredder 7.04 Classic A1200"] >>>>[ECO "E68"] >>>>[Result "1/2-1/2"] >>> >>>Does this mean there will be a separate entry for Shredder 7.04, as opposed to >>>the initial 7.0 release? I'm in favor considering the commotion it's increased >>>strength has caused, but just curious. Also, will the previous programs the 7.0 >>>played be using their book learning? If so, I think it's a mistake as this would >>>be biased against the 7.04. >>> >>> Albert >> >>Do you suggest that shredder classic learning is worse than the learning under >>chessbase interface? >> >>I do not know and I read that the book under chessbase is worse than the classic >>book because the book under chessbase allows also inferior lines. >> >>Uri > >I was under the impression that only the GUI was different, not the opening >books. If the books are different, then my previous comment on books can be >ignored. Otherwise a program that had already learned from opening problems >against 7.0 would now avoid them against 7.04 if they used the same book. > > Albert If I understand correctly the book of the classic interface is more restricted to good lines. I doubt if book learning against shredder7 is going to help much because shredder7.04 is different program than shredder7 and what is good against 7 may be bad against 7.04 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.