Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Try RC5 w/ HT

Author: Matthew White

Date: 12:08:39 05/25/03

Go up one level in this thread


On May 25, 2003 at 09:23:42, Aaron Gordon wrote:

>On May 24, 2003 at 16:53:57, Matthew White wrote:
>
>>On May 23, 2003 at 23:40:23, Aaron Gordon wrote:
>>
>>>>What are they measuring?
>>>>
>>>>IE running two copies _should_ see each copy run about 1/2 as fast with SMT
>>>>on, since each copy is getting roughly 50% of available cpu core resources
>>>>when running the same instruction streams.
>>>>
>>>>Or do you mean something else?
>>>
>>>It's keys per second for RC5, nodes per second for OGR. What I mean is it spawns
>>>1 thread per processor (or virtual processor in HT's case).
>>>My Dual Celeron 400MHz box gets an exact 2.00x speedup with this, I'm assuming
>>>because it doesn't hit the main memory at all. Any other dual processor system
>>>should also get a 2.00x speedup as well.. however I saw some results that were
>>>puzzling. Here they are...
>>>
>>>Dual Xeon (P4) 2.0GHz without HT - 2.8 million keys/sec per thread (5.6mk/s
>>>total), 2 threads total.
>>>
>>>Dual Xeon (P4) 2.0GHz with HT enabled - 0.72 million keys/sec per thread
>>>(2.88mk/s total), 4 threads total.
>>>
>>>I was just wondering if you could run the same tests and confirm this. I would
>>>have figured RC5/OGR would have managed a nice boost from HT, so it's surprising
>>>to me.
>>I have seen similarly poor performance on my Dual Xeon 2.4 GHz with HT enabled.
>>I manually configured the client to only spawn 2 threads.
>>
>>Matt
>
>Did you try OGR too or did you only experience the extreme slowdown with HT
>enabled only with RC5? If OGR was affected in any way, what was the speed
>increase/decrease? Thanks
I just reran the test. With 2 threads, I got 8.6M nodes/sec/thread on OGR and
2.6M keys/sec/thread on RC5-72. With 4 threads, I got 6.6M nodes/sec/thread OGR
and 1.1M keys/sec/thread on RC5-72. So, OGR does show increased performance with
HT, but RC5-72 does not. I only run RC5 cracking, though, since I am much more
interested in cryptography than the Optimal Goloumb Rulers problem :).

Regards,
Matt



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.