Author: Uri Blass
Date: 16:51:29 05/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 26, 2003 at 19:20:09, Albert Silver wrote: >On May 26, 2003 at 17:04:49, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 26, 2003 at 16:06:40, Joachim Rang wrote: >> >>>Uri you missed the point. Amazing is, that Shredder 7.0 Uci leads the 450 Mhz >>>clas with 49 (!) points. That's pretty much isn't it? Of course there are not >>>very many games played so far. >>> >>>regards >>>Joachim >> >>Junior7 earned less than 60 elo from the A1200 so if we assume that shredderUCI >>earn the same then it is hardly number 1 in A1200 >> >>I agree that the difference is more than 60 elo in most of the cases but still >>it is nothing to consider as amazing. >> >>I think that comparing with Fritz7 and deep fritz7 may be misleading because it >>is possible that they were lucky with 1200 mhz and unlucky with 450 mhz. >> >>Based on this result I expect shredder7UCI to be slightly better than >>shredder7(chessbase) >> >>Nothing amazing when we consider the fact that the book of shredder7 chessbase >>includes inferior lines. >> >>Uri > >I think Joachim is right, and you are missing the point. I care very little >about whether it is the UCI version or the Chessbase version. The fact is that >it is performing a good 50 points stronger (for the moment) than the next best >on the same hardware. That's very impressive. It is doing far better than its >predecessor, a great program in its own right, whereas Fritz 8 only managed 1 >elo point more in performance. You are entitled to your opinion, but I think >that is a remarkable software improvement when improvements seem to be getting >harder and harder at the top. > > Albert I agree that there is a remarkable software improvement. I only did not find it amazing. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.