Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 21:26:14 05/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 26, 2003 at 11:22:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>On May 26, 2003 at 02:40:49, Andre van Ark wrote:
>
>>On May 26, 2003 at 02:06:37, Heinz-Josef Schumacher wrote:
>>
>>>>If you want my opinion it doesn't make any sense. Or I need a good explanation,
>>>>and some evidence.
>>>
>>>Exact my opinion! This rumour is in Germany in many heads, but without any
>>>evidence! More than 32 MB hash tables perhaps not useful for the King, but not
>>>bad! People had only misunderstood an old statement by Johan.
>>
>>Good day,
>>
>>32 MB is being used because Johan used in Leiden 30 MB.
>>
>>Kind regards,
>>Andre van Ark
>
> From own [old] tests under CM9-GUI in the analysis mode, I can remember
> that some positions could not be solved at all or not within reasonable
> time if hash tables were set higher than 32 MB hash. This may however be
> no longer a problem after the second patch has been released [I have
> however not investigated this]. And as Andre stated: Johan de Koning does
> not seem to use more than 32 MB hash and there must be some reason for that.
> Kurt
The only reason I can think about is that there is some bug in The King hash
table management. Or some strange design decision. That's what you say suggests
to me, but I must add immediately that given the quality of Johan's work I don't
really believe that it is the case.
Anyway maybe it would be better if Johan could tell us what to do (and if
possible, why).
Christophe
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.