Author: Matthew White
Date: 14:44:10 05/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 28, 2003 at 16:38:44, Ernst Walet wrote: >On May 27, 2003 at 22:39:22, Matthew White wrote: > >>On May 27, 2003 at 03:05:36, Ingo Bauer wrote: >> >>>On May 26, 2003 at 17:46:55, bobby palacios wrote: >>> >>>>[d] 4rk2/3R4/p4q2/2r2p1Q/8/2p5/P1RnBK1P/8 b - - 0 43 >>>> >>>>Taken from Nejmet 3.06 vs List 5.04 (game in 150), p4 2.47 ghz. >>>>..Ne4 also wins, but ..Rxe2! is more convincing. >>> >>>Shredder 7.04 A@2320MHz, 512 MB Hash, 8 min 45 sec >>> >>>Engine: Shredder 7.04 >>>by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen >>> 8/27 0:01 +2.14 1...Ne4+ 2.Kf1 f4 3.Qh7 Nd2+ 4.Rdxd2 cxd2 5.Rxc5 Qa1+ 6.Bd1 >>>Qxd1+ 7.Kg2 (563.814) 433.0 >>> 9/29 0:02 +2.39++ 1...Ne4+ 2.Kf1 f4 3.Qh7 Nd2+ 4.Rdxd2 cxd2 5.Rxd2 f3 6.Kf2 >>>fxe2+ 7.Kg2 e1Q 8.Qh8+ Qxh8 (1.105.893) 445.3 >>> 9/29 0:03 +2.89++ 1...Ne4+ 2.Kf1 f4 3.Qh7 Nd2+ 4.Rdxd2 cxd2 5.Rxd2 f3 6.Kf2 >>>fxe2+ 7.Kg2 e1Q 8.Qh8+ Qxh8 (1.553.913) 452.3 >>> 9/31 0:08 +3.01 1...Ne4+ 2.Kf1 f4 3.Qf3 Rg5 4.Bc4 Nd2+ 5.Rcxd2 cxd2 6.Rxd2 >>>Re3 7.Qa8+ Kg7 8.Rd7+ Kh6 9.Qxa6 (3.863.503) 432.4 >>> 10/35 0:16 +3.26++ 1...Ne4+ 2.Kf1 f4 3.Qf3 Qh4 4.Rd4 Rce5 5.h3 Qg5 6.Rxc3 >>>Ng3+ 7.Ke1 Nxe2 8.Re4 Nxc3 9.Qxf4+ Qxf4 (6.776.290) 423.4 >>> 10/35 0:19 +3.76++ 1...Ne4+ 2.Kf1 f4 3.Qf3 Qh4 4.Rd4 Rce5 5.h3 Qf6 6.Ke1 R5e7 >>>7.Rxc3 Qxd4 (8.174.011) 422.2 >>> 10/35 0:24 +3.76 1...Ne4+ 2.Kg2 f4 3.Rd5 Rxd5 4.Qxd5 f3+ 5.Bxf3 Qg6+ 6.Kf1 >>>Ng3+ 7.hxg3 Qxg3 8.Qf5+ Kg8 9.Rc1 Re1+ 10.Rxe1 Qxe1+ 11.Kxe1 (10.709.460) 428.4 >>> 11/37 0:42 +3.52 1...Ne4+ 2.Kg2 f4 3.Rd5 Rxd5 4.Qxd5 Qg6+ 5.Kf1 Nd2+ 6.Rxd2 >>>cxd2 7.Qxd2 Qe4 8.Kf2 Kg8 9.Bxa6 Qe1+ 10.Qxe1 (17.970.215) 424.4 >>> 12/40 1:58 +3.76 1...Ne4+ 2.Kg2 f4 3.Rd5 Rxd5 4.Qxd5 Re5 5.Qa8+ Kg7 6.Qb7+ >>>Kh6 7.Qd7 Rg5+ 8.Kf3 Qe5 9.Bxa6 Nd2+ (50.835.596) 430.1 >>> 13/42 4:43 +4.01++ 1...Ne4+ 2.Kg2 f4 3.Rd5 Rxd5 4.Qxd5 Re5 5.Qa8+ Kg7 6.Qb7+ >>>Kh6 7.Qd7 Rg5+ 8.Kf3 Qe5 9.Bxa6 Nd2+ (121.599.367) 428.6 >>> 13/42 7:35 +4.01 1...Ne4+ 2.Kf1 f4 3.Qf3 Qh4 4.Rd4 Rce5 5.Rxe4 Rxe4 6.Qxc3 >>>R4e7 7.h3 a5 8.Bg4 Re1+ 9.Kg2 f3+ 10.Bxf3 Qxh3+ 11.Kxh3 (196.384.133) 430.9 >>> 13/42 8:45 +4.02++ 1...Rxe2+ 2.Qxe2 Rc4 3.Rcxd2 Rf4+ 4.Ke1 cxd2+ 5.Kxd2 Qb2+ >>>6.Ke1 Re4 7.Rd8+ Ke7 8.Kf1 Rxe2 9.Kg1 (228.691.459) 434.8 >>> 13/42 9:41 +4.37++ 1...Rxe2+ 2.Qxe2 Rc4 3.Rcxd2 Rf4+ 4.Ke1 cxd2+ 5.Kxd2 Qb2+ >>>6.Ke1 Re4 7.Rd8+ Ke7 8.Kf1 Rxe2 9.Kg1 Kxd8 10.a4 Rxh2 (256.221.116) 440.7 >>>best move: Re8xe2 time: 10:27.182 min n/s: 444.799 CPU 98.9% nodes: >>>278.970.500 >>Shredder 7.04 UCI on a 2x2.40 P4 Xeon w/HT enabled - 4 threads(I used the Arena >>GUI, just for grins): >> >>Shredder 7.04 UCI 88 MB: >>D1- 00:00 -1.08 Re8xe2 Kf2xe2 >>D1 00:00 -1.62 Re8xe2 Qh5xe2 >>D1+ 00:00 1.16 Qf6e6 >>D1 00:00 1.24 Qf6e6 >>D2- 00:00 0.03 Qf6e6 Rd7xd2 c3xd2 Rc2xc5 Qe6xa2 >>D2 00:00 0.03 Qf6e6 Qh5h6 Qe6xh6 >>D2+ 00:00 0.04 Rc5e5 Qh5h8 Qf6xh8 Be2xa6 >>D2+ 00:00 0.75 Rc5e5 Be2c4 >>D2 00:00 1.58 Rc5e5 Be2d3 >>D3+ 00:00 1.83 Rc5e5 Qh5h8 Qf6xh8 Rd7f7 Kf8xf7 >>D3 00:00 1.95 Rc5e5 Be2d3 Re5e1 Qh5xf5 >>D4- 00:00 1.70 Rc5e5 Rd7f7 Kf8g8 Rf7xf6 Re5xe2 Qh5xe2 >>D4- 00:00 1.20 Rc5e5 Rd7f7 Kf8g8 Rf7xf6 Re5xe2 Qh5xe2 Re8xe2 Kf2xe2 >>D4 00:00 -0.04 Rc5e5 Rd7f7 Qf6xf7 Qh5h8 Qf7g8 Qh8f6 Qg8f7 Qf6h8 Qf7g8 Qh8f6 >>Qg8f7 Qf6h8 Qf7g8 >>D4+ 00:00 0.32 Nd2e4 Kf2g2 Ne4g3 Qh5f3 Ng3xe2 Rc2xe2 Re8xe2 Qf3xe2 >>D4+ 00:00 0.67 Nd2e4 Kf2g1 f5f4 Qh5h8 Qf6xh8 Rd7f7 Kf8xf7 >>D4 00:00 1.15 Nd2e4 Kf2f1 Rc5e5 Kf1g1 Ne4d2 >>D5+ 00:00 1.40 Nd2e4 Kf2f1 Rc5e5 Rc2xc3 Ne4xc3 Qh5h8 Qf6xh8 >>D5 00:00 1.40 Nd2e4 Kf2g1 f5f4 Qh5h7 Qf6g7 Rd7xg7 Rc5g5 Rg7xg5 >>D5+ 00:00 1.41 Rc5c8 Rd7f7 Qf6xf7 Qh5h8 Kf8e7 Qh8e5 Qf7e6 Qe5f6 Ke7xf6 >>D5+ 00:00 1.76 Rc5c8 Rd7f7 Qf6xf7 Qh5h8 Kf8e7 Qh8e5 Qf7e6 Qe5f6 Ke7xf6 >>D5 00:00 1.96 Rc5c8 Rd7d3 Qf6b6 Kf2g2 Qb6b7 Kg2f2 Nd2e4 Kf2f1 Qb7b1 Be2d1 >>D6 00:00 1.56 Rc5c8 Rd7d5 Kf8g8 Rd5xf5 Qf6d4 Kf2g3 Qd4e3 Be2f3 Nd2xf3 Rf5xf3 >>D6+ 00:00 1.57 Nd2e4 Kf2e1 Rc5e5 Rc2xc3 Ne4xc3 Qh5h8 Qf6xh8 >>D6+ 00:00 1.92 Nd2e4 Kf2e1 Rc5e5 Rc2xc3 Ne4xc3 Qh5h8 Qf6xh8 >>D6 00:00 1.92 Nd2e4 Kf2e1 f5f4 Qh5h3 Kf8g8 >>D7 00:00 2.16 Nd2e4 Kf2f1 f5f4 Qh5f3 Qf6h4 Qf3xc3 Rc5xc3 Rd7f7 Kf8xf7 >>D8 00:01 2.14 Nd2e4 Kf2f1 f5f4 Qh5h7 Ne4d2 Rd7xd2 c3xd2 Rc2xc5 Qf6a1 Be2d1 >>Qa1xd1 Kf1g2 >>D9+ 00:02 2.39 Nd2e4 Kf2f1 f5f4 Qh5h7 Ne4d2 Rd7xd2 c3xd2 Rc2xd2 f4f3 Rd2d7 >>Re8xe2 Qh7h8 Qf6xh8 >>D9+ 00:02 2.89 Nd2e4 Kf2f1 f5f4 Qh5h7 Ne4d2 Rd7xd2 c3xd2 Rc2xd2 f4f3 Rd2d7 >>Re8xe2 Qh7h8 Qf6xh8 >>D9 00:05 3.18 Nd2e4 Kf2f1 f5f4 Qh5f3 Rc5e5 Rd7d4 Qf6h6 Kf1g1 Qh6g6 Kg1h1 >>Ne4g3 h2xg3 Qg6h7 Kh1g1 Qh7xc2 Rd4xf4 Kf8g8 >>D10 00:08 3.18 Nd2e4 Kf2f1 f5f4 Qh5f3 Rc5e5 Rc2xc3 Ne4xc3 Qf3xc3 Qf6e6 Qc3a3 >>Kf8g8 >>D11+ 00:16 3.43 Nd2e4 Kf2f1 f5f4 Qh5f3 Qf6h4 Rd7d4 Rc5e5 Kf1g1 Re5g5 Qf3g3 >>f4xg3 Rc2xc3 Ne4xc3 >>D11 00:33 3.52 Nd2e4 Kf2g2 f5f4 Rd7d5 Rc5xd5 Qh5xd5 Qf6g6 Kg2f1 Ne4d2 Rc2xd2 >>c3xd2 Qd5xd2 Qg6e4 Kf1f2 a6a5 >>D12 01:08 3.56 Nd2e4 Kf2g2 f5f4 Rd7d5 Rc5xd5 Qh5xd5 Re8e5 Qd5a8 Kf8g7 Qa8c8 >>Re5g5 Kg2f3 Ne4d2 Rc2xd2 c3xd2 Qc8d7 Kg7f8 Qd7c8 Kf8e7 Qc8c7 Ke7e8 Qc7c8 Qf6d8 >>Qc8xd8 >>D12+ 01:59 3.57 Re8xe2 Qh5xe2 Rc5c4 Rd7d3 Rc4f4 Kf2e1 Qf6h4 Qe2f2 Rf4xf2 >>Rd3g3 >>D12+ 01:59 3.92 Re8xe2 Qh5xe2 Rc5c4 Rd7d3 Rc4f4 Kf2e1 Qf6h4 Qe2f2 Rf4xf2 >>Rd3g3 Qh4xh2 Rg3f3 Nd2xf3 Ke1d1 Rf2xc2 >>D12 02:27 4.92 Re8xe2 Qh5xe2 Rc5c4 Rd7d3 Rc4f4 Kf2e1 Qf6h4 Ke1d1 Rf4f1 >>Qe2xf1 Nd2xf1 Rd3xc3 Qh4e4 Kd1c1 Qe4f4 Kc1b2 Qf4d4 > > >I cannot reproduce 12 ply with 88MB hash, no idea why..... > >Ernst. Weird. Are you using 4 threads as well? Matt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.