Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer Chess is Dead - Here is the Proof

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 04:53:26 05/29/03

Go up one level in this thread

On May 29, 2003 at 07:12:28, Peter Berger wrote:

>I agree - especially compaired to the most interesting and topical CCC threads
>like


>Any difference between Fritz 8 vs 8.008 and vs 8.0023 ?

the question is wrong.

Any difference between Fritz 1 vs 2 and vs 3 vs. 8

is the right question.


The answer: Fritz can now handle en passant. Or ?

• Re: Computer Chess is Dead - Here is the Proof Uri Blass 05:20:59 05/29/03
  • Re: Computer Chess is Dead - Here is the Proof Thorsten Czub 06:36:07 05/29/03
    • Re: Computer Chess is Dead - Here is the Proof Uri Blass 06:40:38 05/29/03
      • Re: Computer Chess is Dead - Here is the Proof Ed Schröder 07:31:51 05/29/03
        • Re: Computer Chess is Dead - Here is the Proof Uri Blass 07:48:40 05/29/03
      • Re: Computer Chess is Dead - Here is the Proof Thorsten Czub 06:50:23 05/29/03
        • Re: Computer Chess is Dead - Here is the Proof Uri Blass 07:02:47 05/29/03
          • Re: Computer Chess is Dead - Here is the Proof Thorsten Czub 08:47:06 05/29/03
            • Re: Computer Chess is Dead - Here is the Proof Uri Blass 09:01:36 05/29/03
              • Re: Computer Chess is Dead - Here is the Proof Thorsten Czub 09:18:00 05/29/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.