Author: Manfred Meiler
Date: 05:17:45 05/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 2003 at 06:46:42, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On May 29, 2003 at 04:16:15, James Constance wrote: > >>I think it's a bit rich that they claim the top 13 positions, bearing in mind >>the King is not being tested > > >right. > >The King is not tested! > > >>and Rebel is only in position 14 because there are >>multiple versions of Shredder, Fritz and Chess Tiger. > > >rebel is not tested in the latest version > >ALTHOUGH > >it is for free >it has an autoplayer >it is strong > > >instead they test a fossile rebel. > >why don't they test a fossile fritz ? >fritz 3 would be appropriate , or ? No, not really appropriate :-) The *.exe file of the "fossile" Rebel Century 4.0 is from Jan 3rd 2002 (rebel.eng from Oct 2001). Fritz 3 is from 1995 as far as I remember - and really a "fossile" Fritz :-). An appropriate Fritz version would be Fritz 7 (7.0.0.8 engine from May 2002, 7.0.0.6 from Jan 2002, 7.0.0.2 from Nov 2001). Look at the SSDF result of Fritz 7 (don't know exactly what F7 engine version): http://w1.859.telia.com/~u85924109/ssdf/list.htm Just to be accurate... :-) Regards, Manfred
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.