Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 07:34:56 05/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 2003 at 08:03:31, Mark Young wrote: >On May 29, 2003 at 05:06:49, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>I am starting to believe that a lot of the wins of Shredder are do to the good >>learning and also the extremely optimized Opening Book of Shredder. The only >>fair way to test the strength of any engine would be if the learning files of >>the programs being tested are set to zero and to reverse the Opening books after >>20 games are played between engines. For instance after this match reach 20 >>games the Shredder7.ctg should be applied to Fritz 8, and Fritz8.ctg should be >>assigned to Shredder 7.04. >> >>Pichard. > > >I started a 100 game match a few days ago with Fritz 8 one of many test I have >run with Shredder 7....both programs playing with the same book and playing in >chessbase. Book learning is the same, opening book is the same,hash tables are >the same, Shredder is still winning. IMO in testing Shredder 7, Shredder is the >better program, and wins because of that fact alone. > > >1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890 >1 Shredder 7.04 >½½1½11011001???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > 7.5/12 >2 Fritz 8 >½½0½00100110???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > 4.5/12 12 games is only 12% of the match I would not make any judgement until at least you have reached 50%. The way I look at your scoresheet is that Shredder has only won 3 more games with 88 more games to play. Jorge
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.