Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 15:11:06 05/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 2003 at 16:53:22, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On May 29, 2003 at 12:08:10, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On May 29, 2003 at 11:02:19, Torstein Hall wrote: >> >>>On May 29, 2003 at 08:29:28, David H. McClain wrote: >>> >>>On May 29, 2003 at 07:04:35, Torstein Hall wrote: >> >> >>>If they could autoplay it of course you are right, but to manually play 120 >>>games or whatever is needed to get a reliabel rating is not something most of us >>>like to do! > >As you know if Johann really are interested (we are and has always loved the >engine) he could suggest the propher methods books and so on and the program >should be tested a priori. > >The same goes for Rebel, when Ed has done his decision on what version he want >us to test, the program or version can be included as far as possible. > >Of course you know all this but it is funnier to throw mud on someone than >suggest a reasonable solution for the abovementioned strong programs. > >By the way which version are the strongest Rebel, I have played over 10000 games >with Rebel-programs but for the moment (sadly) I don't have the time to take >part in the testing. I have only played a few houndred games with beta1 against >other programs (compared with a similar match with the original version) and I >agrees that it is a bit better 20-50 elo in my opinion. Thanks Bertil. Spare yourself to test Rebel 12 in its current state, first it is still in beta stage, secondly it makes little sense with the buggy autoplayer. But thanks for the offer anyway, whatever you guys decide is okay to me. But most of all, keep up the good work. Ed >Bertil SSDF
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.