Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 15:53:14 05/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 2003 at 18:21:52, Uri Blass wrote: >You do not accept the reason but there is a reason >not to test them. aha. >The programmers. aha. >If they test chessmaster people will complain that they did not test personality >X. i hope the programmers can stand this :-)) >They wait for the programmers to give them clear >instructions about testing. ?? i would try the default setting. or the setting named on the programmers page. >Ed also can ask them to test if he wants them to do it. >I think that it is a good thing that the ssdf care about >the question if the programmers want them to test. aha. >You can expect in this way usually to test the >best program because you can expect the programmers of >the best program to ask the ssdf to test it. IMO the ssdf should test programs. and order them in the accurate order. if they oversee 2 strong programs - it makes not much sense. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.