Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:51:35 05/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2003 at 10:16:08, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On May 30, 2003 at 09:49:11, Uri Blass wrote: > >Hi Uri, > >please thinking about your statement. >We have x beta testers and x programmers where help us with beta results. >Do you thinking that all of this persons make a bad work. > >I am very disappointed about your posting. This is not something personal. I know about cases when I saw in games draw agreed for movei when no draw was agreed and simply arena decided that it is a draw because the game was more than 90 moves. It was fixed later but the idea to allow to adjudicate games as a draw after more than x moves does not make sense and practically it cause demage because people may not know before the game about it. I think that it may be better if people download a version that does not allow illogical options(I believe that most users do not want adjudication by arena only based on the number of moves and it is possible to have a special version for the minority who are interested in illogical options). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.