Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 08:02:49 05/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2003 at 10:51:35, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 30, 2003 at 10:16:08, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On May 30, 2003 at 09:49:11, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>Hi Uri, >> >>please thinking about your statement. >>We have x beta testers and x programmers where help us with beta results. >>Do you thinking that all of this persons make a bad work. >> >>I am very disappointed about your posting. > > >This is not something personal. > >I know about cases when I saw in games draw agreed for movei when no draw was >agreed and simply arena decided that it is a draw because the game was more than >90 moves. > >It was fixed later but the idea to allow to adjudicate games as a draw after >more than x moves does not make sense and practically it cause demage because >people may not know before the game about it. > >I think that it may be better if people download a version that does not allow >illogical options(I believe that most users do not want adjudication by arena >only based on the number of moves and it is possible to have a special version >for the minority who are interested in illogical options). > >Uri Hi Uri, could you add your message in Arena Support Forum. Thanks for your comments ... FCP Forum (Arena Support): http://f22.parsimony.net/forum41668/ Readme / Buglist: http://www.playwitharena.com/directory/beta.htm I will than add your message later in your readme / buglist file! Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.