Author: Alessio Iacovoni
Date: 10:40:16 10/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 1998 at 12:52:00, James T. Walker wrote: >On October 18, 1998 at 12:13:34, Alessio Iacovoni wrote: > >>1) Shouldn't computer strenght it rather be measured on "average" entry-level >>computers.. i.e. the ones actually used by the majority of people? >> > >Good Question ! I suspect each programmer has to answer that for himself when >he takes on the task of writing a chess program. Like in question (2), How does >the speed of the processors affect each program? Some programs are not great at >blitz but do better at 40/2hrs. So do programmers write their programs to >"Peak" at blitz or at 40/2 and if so what speed processor do they have in mind >when writing the code? I'm afraid I'm only adding to the questions and not the >solution. > > >>2) Also.. do programs benefit in the same way from higher speed and increased >>hash tables? If not, tests would not be comparable, therefore useless. >> >Another good question ! What would the SSDF rating list look like if all >programs were test @ 100mhz or all at 450mhz. Would it be the same?? I suspect >not. > >>3) Why are books used in tests? Shouldn't a top level computer program be >>capable of doing at least decently in the opening phase *without* resorting to >>it's book? If the answer is no.. then it could be easily beaten by even >>lower-performing computers by having it systematically go out of book. Or am I >>wrong? > >I like the idea of Books. If you can write a program that can kick others out >of book and then take advantage of them then go for it! It seems a good >program will survive without it's book if necessary ,(Just like a good human) Unfortunatley I don't know how to program.. so it's up to you guys I guess to implement an "anti-book" feature and to add some "openings" knowledge to your program. >Jim Walker
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.