Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:01:35 05/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2003 at 12:46:56, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >>> Shuffle chess = without FRC Castling rules! > >> But how would shuffle chess be uninteresting and FRC great and marvellous if the >> only minor difference are some strange castling rules? >> That's what really surprises me about your FRC campaign. > >The castling rules are not at all strange. The resulting positions of castling >king and rook are identical to those in normal chess. No The castling rules are strange. If you ask people who know nothing about the rules of FRC to suggest generalization for castling in shuffle chess then I guess that most of them will suggest a different generalization of castling. I believe that most of the people will suggest that the king always move 2 squares to the right side or to the left side when the rook and the king change their order. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.