Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 11:00:55 05/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2003 at 13:46:28, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On May 30, 2003 at 13:26:11, José Carlos wrote: > >>On May 30, 2003 at 10:16:08, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >> >>>On May 30, 2003 at 09:49:11, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>Hi Uri, >>> >>>please thinking about your statement. >>>We have x beta testers and x programmers where help us with beta results. >>>Do you thinking that all of this persons make a bad work. >>> >>>I am very disappointed about your posting. >> >> There's no reason to be disappointed. Nothing is perfect, specially software, >>and all opinions are valid. I'm not disappointed when someone says Averno is >>weak. I know it is. Arena has bugs. You know it has. For example, some games are >>lost on time without making a single move, whereas Winboard doesn't have this >>problem. >> Arena has many nice features and a very pretty looking. And it also has bugs. >>Uri and I prefer Winboard. Many others prefer Arena. >> What's the problem then? >> >> José C. >> >> >>>BTW: >>>Arena is now in 15 languages available. >>>A better news for CCC ... >>> >>>Arena by Martin Blume: >>>http://www.playwitharena.com >>> >>>Best >>>Frank >>> >>>For Jw de Kort: >>>Please add your message in Arena Support Forum. >>>We will look in your problem ... > >Hi, > >no time for an answer of your posting! >I believe an answer is not interesting for other readers. > >Best >Frank Hi, it's quiet plain for me that the group of computer chess persons have different interest. Martin try that 200 engines works fine with x different options. Also his work is for free available. I wish me more messages in our support forum about programming and bug reports and I am sure we have a fantastic result. I have misunderstand a word in the posting of Uri (sorry for this). Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.