Author: Harald Faber
Date: 12:19:32 10/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 1998 at 08:28:12, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>>I like computer test. I just wish we could stop testing the top of the line >>>programs Vs CST. Unless the point of this is to gauge which program is best by >>>how badly the beat CST. >>>>Enrique >> >>Maybe it is to demonstrate that Thorsten is wrong. He ALWAYS claims that CST is >>AS STRONG as the top commercial programs. So nothing to say against games >>between CST and the top. > >It's not so much showing that Thorsten is wrong as being irritated by so many >ringing bells every time CST wins a game and so much silence when it loses, >presenting it as if it were an eater of giants. I still remember the first >results posted here, where CST supposedly defeated Nimzo 98 2-0 and Fritz 5 also >by 2-0. Then I did the same as now with these results: > >CST-Nimzo98 3.5-15.5 (+2 -14 =3) >CST-Fritz 5 1.5-8.5 (+0 -7 =3) >CST-Junior 5 1.5-7.5 (+0 -6 =3) >Enrique Right. but one may get the wrong impression if one always sees CST win, presented by McKlein. If he'd post ALL games including losses then it would be much more accurate and not misleading.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.