Author: Art Basham
Date: 06:19:52 05/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
Thanks Mike... Yes, you are corect...! I know it is a rather common sacrifice, but I was surprised that a computer would make it so fast... we only had 3 minutes to play the entire game... so the computer only had a short time to "think"...:-) Art ==========================On May 31, 2003 at 07:32:21, Mike Hood wrote: >On May 31, 2003 at 00:27:40, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On May 30, 2003 at 20:41:21, Art Basham wrote: >> >>>Today in a match, I watched the new Fritz 8 play... >>> Bxh6...! and went on to win... >>>(I was black...played by Junior 5)... >>> >>>[D]r1b2rk1/1ppq1pp1/2nbp2p/p6Q/2NPB3/2P5/PP3PPP/R1B1R1K1 w - - 0 14 >>> >>>I thought this might be a good "test move" for other engines and programs >>>to try to find...if possible...:-) >>> >>>Art >> >>If possible? The sac is awfully basic and the Bxh6 theme is really one of the >>most played king assault sacs. Really, if this came as a surprise read up some >>books on tactics. The reason is that these types of attacks need to be rote. >>Kingside attack tactics are always the same: The king is either on g8 or h8 and >>one is saccing or preparing to sac on any of the squares around to invite >>everyone to the party. If the sac holds up check when the sac is refused, and >>always check for countersacs or zwischenzugs. >> >> Albert > >If I may be allowed to answer on Art's behalf... I think his surprise was at the >fact that a chess program selected this move. It's a very obvious move for human >players (even a player as weak as myself!) but chess programs are very >materialistic and usually only make "sacrifices" if they can see a way to win >back the material within their move horizon.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.