Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: multi-processor hardware question

Author: margolies,marc

Date: 21:06:43 06/01/03

Go up one level in this thread


thank you for your offer and info. the amd 1700 is a good cheap chip that I use
now.
I don't know if chess engines should be overclocked-- I am still thinking about
this particularly after some of Doc Hyatt's postings regarding the matter.
of course that still does not settle my mobo issue.
-marc



On June 01, 2003 at 20:39:29, Aaron Gordon wrote:

>On June 01, 2003 at 17:35:51, margolies,marc wrote:
>
>>hi all.
>>as there are so many good deep engines out now...
>>i am serioulsy considering assembling a dual processor setup for chess
>>background analysis (on a home lan) and playing (competitively?)
>>
>>What I need from you guys are mobo recommendations uopn which to build a system.
>>i have heard some of you write about an "iwill" brand board.
>>of course I know the specs of the tyan and aopen boards already.
>>Does someone here know if there are any opteron boards floating in the market
>>place yet? ( or is this maximum overkill?)
>>
>>So, I'd appreciate any knowledge mainboard archeitecture recommendations.
>>thanks- marc
>
>I'm not sure about motherboards now days for Athlon systems.. the iWill MPX2 was
>the best one IMO. Now they don't make it any more, which is a shame because it
>was awesome. About processors... I can take special Athlon XP 1700+ chips
>(latest core) and modify them physically to run 2266MHz (2800+ is 2250MHz) on a
>regular 133fsb motherboard and they'll run in SMP.
>
>There are no catches, you just pop in the processor and the motherboard will
>detect it as an Athlon MP 2800+. You don't have to do anything special. The good
>thing is they're extremely cheap AND faster than a dual Xeon 3.06. An added
>bonus is you can pick up a dual Athlon board and two of these modified 2800+ MP
>chips for less than the price of a single 3.06GHz Xeon.
>
>All chips will be fully tested to be completely stable. It's not really
>necessary on the latst cores because all AMD is doing is dropping ~2.4GHz cores
>onto an OPGA package and changing the 'settings' on the chip, marking it to
>whatever the market demands, and selling it. All I'm doing is setting it back to
>what it really is. :)
>
>Also, if requested, I could provide Athlon MP 3200+ to 3400+ chips (2.4-2.53GHz)
>chips, these would technically be considered 'overclocked' and would run at a
>slightly higher voltage than normal.. thus producing a bit of heat (still less
>than a Xeon 3.06, however). I will still test for complete stability of course.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.