Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: multi-processor hardware question

Author: Peter Stayne

Date: 10:37:26 06/02/03

Go up one level in this thread


Speaking of this, have you mastered the mysteries of the thoroughbred/barton
codes? I know the guys at Overclockers.com/.co.uk have been working die hard on
this for a while now. how do you tell the difference between a tbred A and a
Tbred B 1700+? etc...

On June 02, 2003 at 09:47:43, Aaron Gordon wrote:

>On June 02, 2003 at 00:06:43, margolies,marc wrote:
>
>>thank you for your offer and info. the amd 1700 is a good cheap chip that I use
>>now.
>>I don't know if chess engines should be overclocked-- I am still thinking about
>>this particularly after some of Doc Hyatt's postings regarding the matter.
>>of course that still does not settle my mobo issue.
>>-marc
>
>Hyatt is rather inexperienced at overclocking. I'm sure he knows about the
>registers, ASM programming & whatnot but as far as his hands on overclocking
>experience, thats next to nil. I however have been doing it most of my life. I
>test the chips thoroughly and provide headroom to further ensure stability. I've
>sold many pretested overclocked chips, I don't know of a single person that has
>had a problem with the chip being unstable. That is a fact. Soon I will be
>pretesting modified Athlon XP to MP chips.
>
>All AMD does it produce the fastest cores available (same for Intel). They send
>the cores to malaysia to and then they're assembled onto the OPGA packaging.
>These are all the same, and are uncut. They then use a laser to cut the bridges
>and make the chip whatever they want. The chip right next to a 1700+ could have
>been a 3200+. It all depends on how the market is going. If 1700+'s are flying
>off the shelves (and they are), AMD, like they're doing now, will produce more.
>These happen to have ~2.4GHz cores.
>
>>On June 01, 2003 at 20:39:29, Aaron Gordon wrote:
>>
>>>On June 01, 2003 at 17:35:51, margolies,marc wrote:
>>>
>>>>hi all.
>>>>as there are so many good deep engines out now...
>>>>i am serioulsy considering assembling a dual processor setup for chess
>>>>background analysis (on a home lan) and playing (competitively?)
>>>>
>>>>What I need from you guys are mobo recommendations uopn which to build a system.
>>>>i have heard some of you write about an "iwill" brand board.
>>>>of course I know the specs of the tyan and aopen boards already.
>>>>Does someone here know if there are any opteron boards floating in the market
>>>>place yet? ( or is this maximum overkill?)
>>>>
>>>>So, I'd appreciate any knowledge mainboard archeitecture recommendations.
>>>>thanks- marc
>>>
>>>I'm not sure about motherboards now days for Athlon systems.. the iWill MPX2 was
>>>the best one IMO. Now they don't make it any more, which is a shame because it
>>>was awesome. About processors... I can take special Athlon XP 1700+ chips
>>>(latest core) and modify them physically to run 2266MHz (2800+ is 2250MHz) on a
>>>regular 133fsb motherboard and they'll run in SMP.
>>>
>>>There are no catches, you just pop in the processor and the motherboard will
>>>detect it as an Athlon MP 2800+. You don't have to do anything special. The good
>>>thing is they're extremely cheap AND faster than a dual Xeon 3.06. An added
>>>bonus is you can pick up a dual Athlon board and two of these modified 2800+ MP
>>>chips for less than the price of a single 3.06GHz Xeon.
>>>
>>>All chips will be fully tested to be completely stable. It's not really
>>>necessary on the latst cores because all AMD is doing is dropping ~2.4GHz cores
>>>onto an OPGA package and changing the 'settings' on the chip, marking it to
>>>whatever the market demands, and selling it. All I'm doing is setting it back to
>>>what it really is. :)
>>>
>>>Also, if requested, I could provide Athlon MP 3200+ to 3400+ chips (2.4-2.53GHz)
>>>chips, these would technically be considered 'overclocked' and would run at a
>>>slightly higher voltage than normal.. thus producing a bit of heat (still less
>>>than a Xeon 3.06, however). I will still test for complete stability of course.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.