Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 11:11:43 06/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 2003 at 13:37:26, Peter Stayne wrote: >Speaking of this, have you mastered the mysteries of the thoroughbred/barton >codes? I know the guys at Overclockers.com/.co.uk have been working die hard on >this for a while now. how do you tell the difference between a tbred A and a >Tbred B 1700+? etc... Tbred-B 1700+ will be a JIUHB stepping. There are two flavors of the JIUHB however. One is a DUT3C and the other is a DLT3C. Those are hard to find (DLT), however, and are expensive. The Tbred-A's will be something like, "AIRGA", ending with an A (TbredA). >On June 02, 2003 at 09:47:43, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>On June 02, 2003 at 00:06:43, margolies,marc wrote: >> >>>thank you for your offer and info. the amd 1700 is a good cheap chip that I use >>>now. >>>I don't know if chess engines should be overclocked-- I am still thinking about >>>this particularly after some of Doc Hyatt's postings regarding the matter. >>>of course that still does not settle my mobo issue. >>>-marc >> >>Hyatt is rather inexperienced at overclocking. I'm sure he knows about the >>registers, ASM programming & whatnot but as far as his hands on overclocking >>experience, thats next to nil. I however have been doing it most of my life. I >>test the chips thoroughly and provide headroom to further ensure stability. I've >>sold many pretested overclocked chips, I don't know of a single person that has >>had a problem with the chip being unstable. That is a fact. Soon I will be >>pretesting modified Athlon XP to MP chips. >> >>All AMD does it produce the fastest cores available (same for Intel). They send >>the cores to malaysia to and then they're assembled onto the OPGA packaging. >>These are all the same, and are uncut. They then use a laser to cut the bridges >>and make the chip whatever they want. The chip right next to a 1700+ could have >>been a 3200+. It all depends on how the market is going. If 1700+'s are flying >>off the shelves (and they are), AMD, like they're doing now, will produce more. >>These happen to have ~2.4GHz cores. >> >>>On June 01, 2003 at 20:39:29, Aaron Gordon wrote: >>> >>>>On June 01, 2003 at 17:35:51, margolies,marc wrote: >>>> >>>>>hi all. >>>>>as there are so many good deep engines out now... >>>>>i am serioulsy considering assembling a dual processor setup for chess >>>>>background analysis (on a home lan) and playing (competitively?) >>>>> >>>>>What I need from you guys are mobo recommendations uopn which to build a system. >>>>>i have heard some of you write about an "iwill" brand board. >>>>>of course I know the specs of the tyan and aopen boards already. >>>>>Does someone here know if there are any opteron boards floating in the market >>>>>place yet? ( or is this maximum overkill?) >>>>> >>>>>So, I'd appreciate any knowledge mainboard archeitecture recommendations. >>>>>thanks- marc >>>> >>>>I'm not sure about motherboards now days for Athlon systems.. the iWill MPX2 was >>>>the best one IMO. Now they don't make it any more, which is a shame because it >>>>was awesome. About processors... I can take special Athlon XP 1700+ chips >>>>(latest core) and modify them physically to run 2266MHz (2800+ is 2250MHz) on a >>>>regular 133fsb motherboard and they'll run in SMP. >>>> >>>>There are no catches, you just pop in the processor and the motherboard will >>>>detect it as an Athlon MP 2800+. You don't have to do anything special. The good >>>>thing is they're extremely cheap AND faster than a dual Xeon 3.06. An added >>>>bonus is you can pick up a dual Athlon board and two of these modified 2800+ MP >>>>chips for less than the price of a single 3.06GHz Xeon. >>>> >>>>All chips will be fully tested to be completely stable. It's not really >>>>necessary on the latst cores because all AMD is doing is dropping ~2.4GHz cores >>>>onto an OPGA package and changing the 'settings' on the chip, marking it to >>>>whatever the market demands, and selling it. All I'm doing is setting it back to >>>>what it really is. :) >>>> >>>>Also, if requested, I could provide Athlon MP 3200+ to 3400+ chips (2.4-2.53GHz) >>>>chips, these would technically be considered 'overclocked' and would run at a >>>>slightly higher voltage than normal.. thus producing a bit of heat (still less >>>>than a Xeon 3.06, however). I will still test for complete stability of course.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.