Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 11:13:30 06/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 2003 at 13:16:04, Peter Stayne wrote: As I mentioned before, I have no idea how those tests were done, what hardware, what bios settings, memory type/speed, etc. In my own controlled tests with both systems tweaked as fast as they can go the Athlon won in all but 1 test, and that was gzip (by an extremely small margin). >and then sune posts this: > >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?298844 > >showing the 3.06 ahead. > >go figger :) > >On June 02, 2003 at 09:33:07, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>On June 01, 2003 at 20:42:38, Peter Stayne wrote: >> >>>2800+ faster than Xeon 3.06? depends on what software you're running. results >>>vary wildly. Which benchmarks are you referring to? >> >>Chess engines in general >>Like recently Slate ran crafty on a single Xeon 3.06, it got ~1.1 million >>nodes/sec I believe.. and if I remember correctly the 2800+ got 1.38 million.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.