Author: Landon Rabern
Date: 23:15:52 06/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 2003 at 20:32:01, Slobodan R. Stojanovic wrote: >On June 02, 2003 at 19:24:18, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: > >>Hello! >> >>If you like to read my arguments for the castling rules explained at my site, >>read: >> >>'Reasons for the special Rules of Castling' >>at:[http://www.rescon.de/Compu/fullchess3b_e.html] . >> >>Regards, Reinhard > > >Hi, > >your arguments are logical, and compatible with classical chess. But for me the >opposite possibility is not strange: > >a) we establish direct connection between king and castling rook, >b) then we empty destination squares >c) and the castling is possible - SOMETIMES LIKE A MAGIC MOVE. > >This kind of solution has something revolutionary, like many century ago, when >classic chess castling was introduced in the old game. > >Finaly, I think we should ask Bobby Fischer for his oppinion, giving him all our >arguments. I think he is the most indicated to give us the final decision. > >What others intrested in this subject think about ? > >Regards. SL. If you saw on the FCP forum, I was arguing exactly for the intrepration that you proposed. I emailed Fischer a while back and asked him. No response of course. Landon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.