Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: TheFuture of TheKing

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 03:41:38 06/03/03

Go up one level in this thread


On June 02, 2003 at 18:42:38, John Merlino wrote:

>On June 02, 2003 at 15:57:40, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On June 02, 2003 at 15:37:21, John Merlino wrote:
>>
>>>On June 02, 2003 at 14:52:33, Jim Bodkins wrote:
>>>
>>>>As a result of this comment from Da Konig at Leiden ..
>>>>
>>>>"I changed only some minor things, I think that it is very difficult to improve
>>>>the program further. If I start changing things, the program may get weaker". De
>>>>Koning does not want to play in the world championship this year in Graz. "No, I
>>>>don“t want to play there, I want to play Amazons with my program in the
>>>>Olympiad, take a look at the chess games and relax a bit. A world championship
>>>>is a lottery. However, I think that my program would play very well there, it is
>>>>a strong program, of course."
>>>>
>>>>... it appears that TheKing is no longer intended to be competative but is
>>>>instead relagated to a role as an appliance. (Maybe that pays better. It seems
>>>>like a said end to a competative engine however).
>>>
>>>You have missed the point/truth behind both statements.
>>>
>>>The first one merely says that it is "very difficult to improve the program" and
>>>that IF he starts changing things the program may get weaker. This is true for
>>>ANY commercial program.
>>
>>It is not clear that it is true for every commercial program.
>>The fact that a program plays well does not mean that it is very difficult to
>>improve it.
>>
>>Uri
>
>You may be right, but I would generally suspect that it IS true. I would tend to
>believe that most commercial programmers have spent many MANY long and hard
>hours (since they are being paid for their work) on tweaking every aspect of
>their program to improve both the play and the performance.
>
>I doubt that there is anything left on their respective lists that is both easy
>to implement and will provide a definite improvement. If there was, it would
>have been done by now.
>
>jm

Or maybe there is and they simply did not think about it.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.