Author: Harald Faber
Date: 04:19:36 06/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 04, 2003 at 06:29:30, stuart taylor wrote: >On June 03, 2003 at 13:04:15, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On June 03, 2003 at 12:02:42, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>On June 03, 2003 at 08:08:03, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>>my Junior 8 test has just begun, 6 games already completed. Current standing is >>>>3.0-3.0 vs. Shredder 7.04 classic. (2 PCs, tournament time control) >>>> >>>>News, infos, conditions and current standings on my homepage at >>>>www.harald-faber.de (only in German) >>>>Games will be available after each completed match. >>> >>>Will you be able to keep us updated in English. >> >>Hm, I thought 3.0-3.0 is the same in German as in English. ;-) > > > >What I actually had in mind was discussion regarding if Junior 8 is greatest in >middlegame or end-game, or in which positions yes and which not. Simply the >results, don't say enough about the machine ot even its playing strengths and >characteristics. Ican't easily play through games to see for myself, as I don't >have all the equipment (e.g. winboard etc.) >S.Taylor - Everyone will be able to replay the games as I will publish them after each match. - I will analyze the games after the complete test is done. Not earlier. Maybe some other club player is capable of reviewing the played games too, maybe earlier. - I doubt that I will have time nor interest in commenting in German and in English, because usually my reports are very long and in most cases contain at least one position per game. For 100 games, well, you can imagine how much that is and how much work it will be to translate it into English. You can take see some examples if you look at my reports for some other older engines, e.g. in the German section the Shredder 6 classic test report is pretty long.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.