Author: Mark Young
Date: 00:09:03 06/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2003 at 02:34:14, David Kye wrote: >On June 04, 2003 at 22:47:54, Mark Young wrote: > >>On June 04, 2003 at 20:47:53, David Kye wrote: >> >>> >>> I would imagine that it is now pretty safe to say that the top programs are >>>without doubt rated around 2650+ on machines 2400mhz and faster? >> >>Yes, it is very safe to say this...and 2650 maybe too low. I would say looking >>at the results of the past and the better programs of today 2700+ is safe to say >>on a 2400mhz machine. >> >>It seems only the elite few in the GM ranks can hope to have plus scores against >>the best programs. >> >>I have seen what the computers can do playing the GM's of a lower class. > > > How much faster was the machine that played kramnick and kasparov then a 2400? >I guess the two can't be compared since it was much faster hardware against the >two k's I would guess around 3x faster, but here your talking about a computer and program that showed a 2800+ rating in both Kasparov and Kramnik matches. Junior played on a faster computer then Fritz, but Junior IMO was a weaker program so the rating was about the same in both short matches.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.