Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: mistakes in the ssdf list

Author: blass uri

Date: 14:10:39 10/19/98

Go up one level in this thread



On October 19, 1998 at 16:03:44, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On October 19, 1998 at 15:44:37, blass uri wrote:
>
>>I found that in game 3917 between hiarcs6 and fritz3
>>the right result was a draw by the 50 move rule and not a win for hiarcs6
>>Fritz3 captured hiarcs knight after 100 plies without captures and without
>>moving a pawn.
>>
>>I found that sometimes the operators decide about the result of a long game
>>without finishing it and I do not think that the result is always justified.
>Hasn't the 50 move rule been modified since provable mates are described beyond
>50 now, as proven by endgame tablebases?

No, and there are positions of KNN v KP when there is a long mate and
practically they are draw in exact game.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.