Author: Heiko Mikala
Date: 15:33:05 10/19/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 19, 1998 at 17:24:58, blass uri wrote:
>On October 19, 1998 at 17:22:11, g.müller wrote:
>
>>Here the third tournament partie:
>>[Event "Test"]
>>[Site "?"]
>>[Date "1998.??.??"]
>>[Round "?"]
>>[White "CSTal V289 K6450"]
>>[Black "Junior5.032 PII450"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[ECO "B97"]
>>[Annotator "Junior 5.0"]
>>[PlyCount "67"]
>
>Is the k6450 faster than PII450?
>If yes what is the ratio of speed for cstal?
I found the following test results in CSS:
PII 300, 64 MB Ram
K6 300, 64 MB Ram, 100 MHz Bus (does the k6 450 have a 100 MHz Bus?)
BS-Test suite, position no. 11:
PII 300 K6 300 K6 better by
CSTal, depth 9, move 2/44 01:56 01:46 9 %
8 MB Hash depth 9, move 8/44 03:23 03:05 10 %
depth 10, move 2/44 07:59 07:17 10 %
So, a K6 with a 100 MHz Bus seems to be approx. 10% faster than
a PII for CSTal. That shouldn't make too much a difference in the
outcome of the matches, I think.
Heiko.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.