Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:40:33 06/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2003 at 15:16:51, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On June 06, 2003 at 07:54:07, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On June 06, 2003 at 07:06:41, Drexel,Michael wrote: >> >>>On June 06, 2003 at 06:15:36, Ryan B. wrote: >>> >>>>Making a strong opening book may not be so high on his to-do list at this time. >>>>I don?t see how where he is from has anything to do with his opening book. The >>>>best of the free programs not named rebel 12 I have seen just generate an >>>>opening book from pgn files such as gm2600.pgn This way of making an opening >>>>book requires no actual chess skill and defiantly in no way discriminates based >>>>on ones home land. >>> >>>And such books are definitely weak. The Ruffian book is relatively weak for >>>example. >> >>Ruffian book seems to be very good based on Ruffian results in Leo tournament. >>Uri > > From our tests with Ruffian 1.0.1 UCI under > Fritz-GUI, we would say that the book of > Ruffian is a good one. The program scores > always better with its own book in comparison > when we used the remis.ctg. > Kurt Do you say that Ruffian scores better under Fritz gui when all programs use their original books and not when all programs use remis.ctg and after every game they play a game in the same opening with opposite colors? Do you think that the commercial programs have inferior book relative to Ruffian or Maybe the problem is that Ruffian has a bug in using other books and it's time management or it's moves are broken for some reason when you force it not to use it's book. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.