Author: Ryan B.
Date: 19:59:26 06/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
At this time I feel a little cheated too. But I would much rather have the time bug fixed than my money back. In actual game play I think Junior 8 is the strongest engine I have seen. I also don’t see what the big deal is about the 2-engine claim that Chessbase made. Most programs only come with one version with the exemption of Chess Tiger. I think most people would only use the strongest version of Junior 8 anyway. I am still confident that the makers of Junior will fix the time bug and we will hopefully all be happy. Ryan On June 06, 2003 at 19:09:51, William Dozier wrote: >To the programmers of junior 8, I have brought and played most of >the chess, that most of us play with, and I have been pretty much please >with them,some bad,some good. But junior is the worst product that I brought >and play with other really good chess players, and other excellent chess >programs. But I wish i could get my money back, I even would settle for Junior >7. This is my personal opinion. Have a beautful and productive d > > Bill Dozier. > >Ps. New Email: RES18IHF@verizon.net
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.