Author: Peter Stayne
Date: 21:26:44 06/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
My thoughts exactly, everyone's entitled to their opinion of course, and my opinion is that there's a lot of overreacting going on here. Junior 8 is strong, and it is disappointing that the time bug wasn't detected prior to shipping, but I'd say the chances of them fixing it sometime in the near future are pretty good. Pete On June 06, 2003 at 22:59:26, Ryan B. wrote: >At this time I feel a little cheated too. But I would much rather have the time >bug fixed than my money back. In actual game play I think Junior 8 is the >strongest engine I have seen. I also don’t see what the big deal is about the >2-engine claim that Chessbase made. Most programs only come with one version >with the exemption of Chess Tiger. I think most people would only use the >strongest version of Junior 8 anyway. I am still confident that the makers of >Junior will fix the time bug and we will hopefully all be happy. > >Ryan > >On June 06, 2003 at 19:09:51, William Dozier wrote: > >>To the programmers of junior 8, I have brought and played most of >>the chess, that most of us play with, and I have been pretty much please >>with them,some bad,some good. But junior is the worst product that I brought >>and play with other really good chess players, and other excellent chess >>programs. But I wish i could get my money back, I even would settle for Junior >>7. This is my personal opinion. Have a beautful and productive d >> >> Bill Dozier. >> >>Ps. New Email: RES18IHF@verizon.net
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.