Author: Komputer Korner
Date: 20:31:18 10/19/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 1998 at 05:51:42, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On October 18, 1998 at 00:34:21, blass uri wrote: > >>can cstal find better move if it have more time? >>The game that cstalblack won Junior5 was played in 40/2 hours and not in 40/40. > >All programs can find better moves with more time and faster processors, not >only CST. Will CST improve from extra time more than Junior 5? I wonder. Maybe. >But not enough to change results by much. 40/40 on a PII-400 is no blitz. > >>Does cstal use a small part of the regular time in the opening moves or play >>without thinking in the opening? > >CST's book is on CD and plays the openings instantly. > >>In your games I saw 3 seconds per move but I do not know if it is because it >>thinks in the opening or because it needs time to read the moves from the cd > >These 2 or 3 seconds are auto232 delay. Junior will register the 3 seconds it >takes to receive CST's move, but CST will count 0 seconds. > >Enrique > >>Uri If this is the case you would have to accept that each program's clock counts as the official time, the same as the Hergott-Hiarcs match. Does the SSDF do this? -- Komputer Korner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.