Author: Aaron Tay
Date: 12:30:09 06/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2003 at 17:25:59, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On June 06, 2003 at 16:58:00, Günther Simon wrote: > >>>>Aarghh! setting up Ruffian (or whatever WB program) with the WB adapter >>>>under CB proves nothing' and was not what Uri suggested you to do. >>>>You simply have to set up it in WINBOARD if you want to see if is >>>>somehow weakened under the CB Gui and I bet it is - I know of cases, >>>>when the Gui even sent moves which the program never thought of! >>> >>>You should read more carefully. I wrote 'some time ago'. >>>In order to use Ruffian in the Fritz 5.32 GUI. >>>I even have no WINBOARD on my Computers. Fritz,Chessmaster,SCID >>>and Shredder Classic are more than enough GUIs for me. I plan to install also >>>the Lokasoft GUI as soon as Gandalf 6 or Rebel 12 are released. >> >>Time has nothing to do with the subject, the procedure was wrong. >>If you really want to test/play WB programs at their max. strength, >>you should give the natural GUI a chance, especially as WB support for CB >>simply does not exist...(it has more features than you might think + >>full debug ability) >> >>Regards, >>Günther > >I was just curious to see whether Ruffian with Winboard adapter in Fritz is >slower than Ruffian UCI in Fritz. For that purpose the procedure was reasonable >and I dont think it is slower in solving Testpositions. It's shouldn't be. Most of the problems I think with the Winboard adaptor relate to actually playing a game not analyze of a position. Some of the problems can be dealt with (ignoring the new sent by fritz which smarthink does but i doubt ruffian does) others cannot (strange moves not considered by the engines),which perhaps explains why you saw this http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?299585 > >Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.