Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Do you play on the 3-D boards or the flat 2-D

Author: Omid David Tabibi

Date: 15:52:36 06/07/03

Go up one level in this thread


On June 07, 2003 at 18:42:42, Andrew Williams wrote:

>On June 07, 2003 at 18:38:14, Omid David Tabibi wrote:
>
>>On June 07, 2003 at 18:17:23, Russell Reagan wrote:
>>
>>>On June 07, 2003 at 14:46:17, Alan Grotier wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have tried playing on the 3-D boards in F8 but still prefer the flat 2-D.
>>>>
>>>> I while ago I dragged-out my Miphisto Vancouver 12hz and for a while had a
>>>> hard time playing on a real board.Question of perspectives.Nothing to do
>>>> to do with the great program that has always thrashed me.
>>>
>>>I had the same problem. I played most of my games online for a long time, and my
>>>OTB play suffered. Online the basic tactics came easily, as well as most simple
>>>combinations, and I did pretty well online. OTB, I was horrible. I felt very
>>>uneasy. I felt like I couldn't "see" the board very well. I hung pieces
>>>frequently and lost to 600-900 players :( A few things that I recommend to get
>>>your OTB vision back are:
>>>
>>>1. Play OTB chess (obviously)
>>>
>>>2. Setup tactical problems on a board and try to solve them. Take your time,
>>>because a main goal of yours is to get your "chess vision" back for OTB play, so
>>>spending time focused in that mindset will help you feel better about what you
>>>can see easily OTB. I particularly found doing mate in 3 problems on a board,
>>>from Polgar's "big book", to be very helpful (I guess since it was almost all
>>>calculation).
>>>
>>>3. Try playing over games blindfold. It isn't as hard as it might sound. In
>>>fact, it's not hard at all. Anyone can do it. The hard part is having the
>>>patience to carry it out. It can take a long time to play over a single game in
>>>your head at first. I was able to do it on my first try, but it took me over an
>>>hour, and it was pretty boring, but it helped a lot. One book I highly recommend
>>>if you find this interesting is The Inner Game of Chess by Soltis. He discusses
>>>how to calculate, and teaches you how to be able to play over games blindfold.
>>>
>>
>>Playing blindfold is not hard at all. You just have to "live" in the 64 squares
>>:) For example, you have to intuitively know that a bishop on b3 attacks g8, and
>>not start finding out the path (assuming that you don't have an empty board to
>>cheat!).
>>
>>Once I played a simultaneous blindfold against 8 (weak) players. Needless to say
>>that after finishing the games I slept for 16 hours and had a severe headache
>>for the rest of week... (I never repeated that insane experience)
>>
>>
>>From http://www.sigschess.com/news_32103.html :
>>
>>"Russians, however, were not always so eager to let their chess greats
>>play blindfold. It's commonly reported that Soviet chess authorities
>>banned blindfold chess because of possible health dangers.
>>
>>"The belief had some precedent. Some early blindfold greats following
>>Philidor suffered from insanity.
>>
>>"American chess legend Paul Morphy, who dazzled 19th century Parisian
>>crowds with blindfold exhibitions against the strongest French players,
>>went insane and died at age 47 in New Orleans in 1884.
>>
>>"Another American blindfold wizard, Harry Pillsbury, went insane, and
>>many blamed it on his excessive blindfold play."
>>
>>
>>
>
>Interesting to speculate about causality here. Is it that blindfold chess makes
>you go insane, or that only insane people voluntarily play blindfolded?

Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

Is it that computer chess makes you go insane, or that only insane people
voluntarily turn to computer chess?

...

>I'm not
>speculating about you, Omid; you had the good sense to only try it once!!

Some people have told me that my one time experience has already resulted in
permanent damage :)


>
>AW



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.