Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:54:49 06/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 09, 2003 at 02:51:02, Christophe Theron wrote: >On June 09, 2003 at 00:50:29, Mike S. wrote: > >>Recently it has been critized that SSDF doesn't test King 3.23 (yet), it has >>been discussed, explained why not, etc.etc. >> >>(Purists of 40/2h shouldn't continue to read :-)) >> >>I think nowadays, 10m+10s can provide a perfectly valid comparison too. On this >>rating list created by Mr. Klaus Wlotzka for CSS Magazine, > > > >10+10 or 2+2 are the worst time controls you can imagine for Chess Tiger because >it does not handle Fischer time controls correctly. > >Actually you can do even worse by playing 1+100 for example, but 10+10 is >already a big problem for Tiger. > >So I'm surprised that it ends up at such a good place... > > > > Christophe > This problem is known for months. what is the reason that you did not care to fix it? It seems to me something simple. I am talking only about a productive fix and not talking about optimal time management for fisher time control and I think that the problem of using time in the best way is not a simple problem. Is there something that I miss? The only explanation that I can think about is that maybe you lost the source code of Chess Tiger15. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.